- GHK-CuCopper Tripeptide-1What is GHK-Cu?
- GHK-Cu is the 1:1 coordination complex of the tripeptide glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine (Gly-His-Lys) with a copper(II) ion. Its INCI name is Copper Tripeptide-1 and the complex CAS is 89030-95-5; the copper is part of the active molecule, not an additive, which is why the lot is characterised as a copper complex rather than as a peptide that happens to list copper.
- AHK-CuCopper Tripeptide-3What is AHK-Cu and how does it differ from GHK-Cu?
- AHK-Cu is the copper(II) complex of alanyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine — the same coordination motif as GHK-Cu with alanine in place of glycine at the N-terminus. That single methyl group at the α-carbon slightly distorts the geometry around the copper, giving AHK-Cu a marginally lower formation constant and a d-d band shifted a few nanometres from GHK-Cu. The two are characterised against their own separate references and are not interchangeable in a formula.
- Copper coordinationWhat does copper coordination mean in a copper peptide?
- Coordination is the bonding arrangement in which donor atoms from the peptide ligand attach directly to a central copper(II) ion, holding it in a defined geometric pocket. In GHK-Cu the copper is held by nitrogen and oxygen donors from the peptide rather than sitting loose alongside it — and because the bioactivity tracks the intact coordinated complex, the coordination state is the thing a copper-peptide spec is really describing.
- ChelationWhat is chelation and why does it matter for copper peptides?
- Chelation is coordination in which a single ligand grips a metal ion through two or more donor atoms at once, forming a ring that holds the metal far more tightly than isolated bonds would. GHK chelates copper(II) through several donor atoms in the same molecule, which is what makes the complex stable; conversely a competing chelator in a formula (notably EDTA) can pull the copper away from the peptide over shelf life, which is the most common way a copper-peptide product loses its active.
- Cu²⁺ : peptide molar ratioWhat Cu²⁺ : peptide molar ratio should a copper peptide have?
- The Cu²⁺ : peptide molar ratio is how many copper ions are present per peptide molecule in the finished powder. For a 1:1 complex like GHK-Cu or AHK-Cu the theoretical value is 1.00, and well-coordinated commercial lots cluster between 0.95 and 1.05. Below 0.95 part of the powder is uncoordinated peptide (not the active); above 1.05 the excess is free copper, a pro-oxidant in finished formulations.
- Apo-peptide (free GHK)What is the difference between GHK and GHK-Cu?
- The apo-peptide is the metal-free ligand — free GHK is the bare glycyl-histidyl-lysine tripeptide (a white powder, molecular weight about 340.4), as opposed to GHK-Cu, the blue copper complex (about 401.9). They are distinct actives, not two grades of one: the activity attributed to GHK-Cu is a property of the intact complex, so free GHK is not a cheaper substitute, and a lot labelled GHK-Cu that is white or shows no copper is apo-peptide regardless of the name on the bag.
- Blue chromophoreWhy is GHK-Cu blue?
- The blue of a copper peptide is not added pigment — it is the chromophore created when copper(II) sits in its square-planar peptide pocket, the colour arising from the d-d electronic transition of the bound metal. The free apo-peptide is white; the appearance of the blue is direct visual evidence that the copper is coordinated, which is why a pale, patchy, or green-shifted cake is treated as a coordination problem worth a hold-and-review.
- Square-planar geometryWhat is the coordination geometry of GHK-Cu?
- Square-planar geometry describes a copper(II) centre with four donor atoms arranged in a plane around it — the arrangement GHK-Cu adopts at its working pH. That geometry is what produces the characteristic d-d band and the blue colour; a distorted, split, or shifted band on the UV-Vis trace is read as the copper sitting in a different or mixed coordination environment rather than the clean square-planar field.
- Coordination numberWhat is the coordination number of copper in GHK-Cu?
- The coordination number is the count of donor atoms bonded directly to the central metal ion. In the square-planar GHK-Cu complex the copper(II) has a coordination number of four — three nitrogen donors (the histidine imidazole, the N-terminal amine, and a deprotonated backbone amide) plus a carboxylate oxygen completing the fourth position.
- Ligand / donor atomWhat is a ligand and a donor atom in a copper peptide?
- A ligand is the species that binds a metal ion; the donor atoms are the specific atoms within it that supply the electron pairs forming each bond. In GHK-Cu the peptide is the ligand, and its donor atoms are the nitrogens of the histidine imidazole, the N-terminal amine, and a backbone amide, together with a carboxylate oxygen — the set of donors that defines the complex's geometry and stability.
- Histidine imidazole coordinationHow does histidine anchor copper in GHK-Cu?
- The imidazole ring on the histidine side chain supplies a nitrogen donor that acts as the strongest single anchor for the copper(II) in GHK-Cu and AHK-Cu. Because this imidazole nitrogen is central to the binding, the histidine residue is the reason the His-containing tripeptides coordinate copper so tightly — and its protonation at low pH is part of why the complex dissociates outside the working window.
- Coordination integrityWhat does coordination integrity mean for a copper-peptide lot?
- Coordination integrity is the degree to which the copper in a lot is actually held in its proper peptide pocket rather than sitting free or in a mixed environment. It is read together from several signals — a clean d-d band at the expected wavelength, a Cu²⁺ : peptide ratio near 1.00, a high bound-copper fraction, and a colour that matches the master reference — because no single number proves the complex is intact on its own.
- Formation constantWhat is a formation constant for a copper peptide?
- The formation constant is the equilibrium measure of how strongly a ligand holds a metal ion — a larger value means a more stable complex. GHK-Cu has a high formation constant, which is why its copper stays coordinated through normal handling; AHK-Cu's is slightly lower (a small log-K difference) owing to the geometric strain from its extra methyl group, which makes it marginally more sensitive to pH drift and reductive interference in a formula.